JRT kills baby

Very sad news.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2236193/Newborn-dies-bitten-pet-Jack-Russell-dog-grandparents-house-tragic-accident.html

The photos used of the mother however are terrible. If i was the mother of this poor little boy i would be FURIOUS that they used pictures like that of me.

whoops just seen this was posted already.

Still stand by my statement on the mothers photos lol

That is the daily mail for you. Totally missing the point of the story and trying to sensationalise the mother instead as thats what people want apparently. I despise that 'newspaper'

PygmyParrot wrote:That is the daily mail for you. Totally missing the point of the story and trying to sensationalise the mother instead as thats what people want apparently. I despise that 'newspaper'

I must have been in another world for ages as never saw the Daily Mail like that and thought such tactics were left to the sun etc. However , on the grounds of privacy and all that , don't put pics online for everyone to see if you are bothered that people might use them for other stuff.

It;'s getting away from the subject though and just goes to show that all dogs CAN BE problematic not just ours and its all down to circumstances

I have the Daily Mail paper every day, and unless I was blind (and I must admit I don't read it cover to cover) then I missed this story.

However, I DID hear of it on the BBC radio news today.

Oh how my heart goes out to the parents and grandparents of that poor baby.

i can not believe they using a photos of a dog that may not be the dog that kill the baby!!

it's just not right

Steve wrote:i can not believe they using a photos of a dog that may not be the dog that kill the baby!!

it's just not right

i know! if they did that of a person the person would win millions.

How unfortunate that after that, further down the page they feel the need to show a pic of a baby boy attacked by a Staff Why can't they just try to the facts on one story right instead of manipulating 3 different stories, this is why I don't read papers

Steve wrote:i can not believe they using a photos of a dog that may not be the dog that kill the baby!!

it's just not right

No it's rotten journalism. Hence my dislike of that paper plus so many others. May be more subtle than the sun etc but it's no better when you deconstruct it.

They also included the house price for some reason?

I have just seen a pic of the dog, in no way is this dog a Jack Russell he is a mongrel full stop , people with Parson Jack Russells will be angry as will people who are members of the Jack Russell club of Great Britain, Jack Russells are predominatly White they always have been , this dog had a big head and was brown or Tan in no way a Jack Russell , this is a tragedy and one that should never had happened , no child so young should be left alone with any Dog .

mickgill wrote:I have just seen a pic of the dog, in no way is this dog a Jack Russell he is a mongrel full stop , people with Parson Jack Russells will be angry as will people who are members of the Jack Russell club of Great Britain, Jack Russells are predominatly White they always have been , this dog had a big head and was brown or Tan in no way a Jack Russell , this is a tragedy and one that should never had happened , no child so young should be left alone with any Dog .

Agreed.. quite clearly a crossbreed. Sadly, journalism doesn't tend to involve many facts..