We need to get whoever wrote this fired!

To whom it may concern

As a reader of your online article's, I can no begin to describe how disgusted I was by the article attacking staffordshirebull terriers. It was a shameless bias attack on one breed of dog that results in more breed discrimination that is not needed in this world. Articles like this often do not result in the offending dogs being removed or avoided, but the innocent ones being judged and in some cases killed for no fault of their own. If the writer believes that needing a test to own one of these dogs is foolish based on the fact that then we would need to enforce parent based testing then perhaps given the authors description of the kinds of people who own these dog, there should be parent based testing on these people.
I myself have owned both a Labrador and a staffordshire bullterrier, both being perfectly harmless. In fact I know a Stafford that is a trained search and rescue dog. My own being micro chipped and competing in shows. I say, if the author wanted to being breed into their article they may have referred to some people owning these dogs, but as for going as far as to call them unlovable beasts and that the owners are unsavory is in poor taste. I myself am offended, for i am not some tattooed, union jack toteing person, but a fashion hairstylist who has many times worked in Milan and Paris for Coco Channel, Louis Vuitton and many other runways and magazines. My Stafford has even been used as a model for fashion magazines, children's fashion magazines mind you.
I have notified my peers of my outrage about this article, and they range from right in the heart of London to as far as Helsinki Finland, All have agreed to stop reading the articles that you produce.
While I understand ones right to freedom of speech and personal opinion, there is no room for personal opinion in journalism of this type, and I hope to see a retraction of the aforementioned article.

sincerely
T. Baker.