The SPCAs view on BSL
2 posters
Page 1 of 1
The SPCAs view on BSL
Even though, because of the law, they have to comply its at least good to know that the SPCAs don't agree with BSL.
RSPCA
Q4. Do you think that breed-specific legislation, in its current form, is effective in protecting the
public from dangerous dogs? Why?
• In short no.
• Breed specific legislation (BSL) is unfair and unjustifiable and government should adopt an
approach that recognises that any individual dog, irrespective of breed or type, can display
aggression towards people, and that responsibility for this lies with the owners.
• Acknowledge that the Government has a real challenge in taking forward and implementing any
measures relating to such a sensitive high profile subject.
• The initial and main purpose of section 1 of the Dangerous Dogs Act 1991 (DDA) was to control
the number of Pit Bull Terriers (PBTs) in circulation, public protection.
• In the UK the DDA bans four types of dogs traditionally bred for fighting. Fighting types have
been selected for specific physical and temperamental attributes which means that the
consequences are more severe if they do show aggression.
• Yet there is no specific evidence to demonstrate that breeds with a fighting past are more
aggressive towards people than other dogs.
• A dog bite of the same force, administered by the same jaw configuration, could be more
injurious when delivered to a victim’s head and neck than when delivered to the torso or
extremities.
• There are a number of different factors which impact on the extent of injury aside from size and
power.
• A PBT in a responsible owner’s hands poses little or no risk. whereas a PBT in an irresponsible
owner’s hands could pose significant risk to public safety (and also that of other animals’
welfare).
• BSL does not and cannot effectively protect the public from ‘dangerous dogs’ - i.e. dogs that
pose a risk to the public and this is especially the case when the current law has been poorly
enforced many police forces to date.
• An approach that bans specific breeds or types completely overlooks the critical developmental
and environmental influences upon individual dog behaviour.
• BSL does not take into account that any dog, irrespective of breed or type, could display
aggression towards people.
ASPCA
RSPCA
Q4. Do you think that breed-specific legislation, in its current form, is effective in protecting the
public from dangerous dogs? Why?
• In short no.
• Breed specific legislation (BSL) is unfair and unjustifiable and government should adopt an
approach that recognises that any individual dog, irrespective of breed or type, can display
aggression towards people, and that responsibility for this lies with the owners.
• Acknowledge that the Government has a real challenge in taking forward and implementing any
measures relating to such a sensitive high profile subject.
• The initial and main purpose of section 1 of the Dangerous Dogs Act 1991 (DDA) was to control
the number of Pit Bull Terriers (PBTs) in circulation, public protection.
• In the UK the DDA bans four types of dogs traditionally bred for fighting. Fighting types have
been selected for specific physical and temperamental attributes which means that the
consequences are more severe if they do show aggression.
• Yet there is no specific evidence to demonstrate that breeds with a fighting past are more
aggressive towards people than other dogs.
• A dog bite of the same force, administered by the same jaw configuration, could be more
injurious when delivered to a victim’s head and neck than when delivered to the torso or
extremities.
• There are a number of different factors which impact on the extent of injury aside from size and
power.
• A PBT in a responsible owner’s hands poses little or no risk. whereas a PBT in an irresponsible
owner’s hands could pose significant risk to public safety (and also that of other animals’
welfare).
• BSL does not and cannot effectively protect the public from ‘dangerous dogs’ - i.e. dogs that
pose a risk to the public and this is especially the case when the current law has been poorly
enforced many police forces to date.
• An approach that bans specific breeds or types completely overlooks the critical developmental
and environmental influences upon individual dog behaviour.
• BSL does not take into account that any dog, irrespective of breed or type, could display
aggression towards people.
ASPCA
Guest- Guest
Re: The SPCAs view on BSL
Pretty much how I see things.
Ben- Staffy-Bull-Terrier VIP Member
- Status :
Online Offline
Location : Davis, CA
Dogs Name(s) : Frosty, Piglette
Dog(s) Ages : 3, 5
Dog Gender(s) : Male, Female
Join date : 2011-08-12
Support total : 325
Posts : 6504
Re: The SPCAs view on BSL
Totally agree!!
Andy- Staffy-Bull-Terrier VIP Member
- Status :
Online Offline
Location : Worcester area
Dogs Name(s) : Max
Dog(s) Ages : DOB: Aug 2010
Dog Gender(s) : Male
Join date : 2011-11-02
Support total : 305
Posts : 3908
Similar topics
» Moo with a View......
» Room with a view
» Neuticles - What is your view?
» Smile & view
» Whats your view?
» Room with a view
» Neuticles - What is your view?
» Smile & view
» Whats your view?
Page 1 of 1
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum